|
|
Post by cpf on Feb 9, 2019 22:08:19 GMT
Secret in Their Eyes
|
|
|
|
Post by Dani on Feb 10, 2019 7:07:05 GMT
A Star Is Born (2018), 'twas nice. Didn't cry though.   |
|
|
|
Post by heehawes on Feb 10, 2019 7:08:23 GMT
blah
|
|
|
|
Post by drnick on Feb 10, 2019 9:34:21 GMT
A Star Is Born (2018), 'twas nice. Didn't cry though.  |
|
|
|
Post by drnick on Feb 10, 2019 9:34:54 GMT
What's that? Never heard of it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinkgurl on Feb 12, 2019 21:04:16 GMT
Happy death day
|
|
|
|
Post by drnick on Feb 15, 2019 21:28:13 GMT
Halloween (2018) ... now that was rather poor, even with Jamie Lee.  |
|
|
|
Post by heehawes on Feb 15, 2019 23:02:17 GMT
Halloween (2018) ... now that was rather poor, even with Jamie Lee. I thought it was ok. it was kinda cool that they just threw away every other sequel and just ran this as a direct sequel to the original. Loved the "isnt he your moms brother?", "No thats just something people made up", to get that idea out of the way - and brought it back to Michael just being a crazy w/ no real motive. The ending was "eh", and a lot of the middle stuff was "eh", but I think it was a decent Halloween film. |
|
|
|
Post by drnick on Feb 16, 2019 9:59:34 GMT
Halloween (2018) ... now that was rather poor, even with Jamie Lee. I thought it was ok. it was kinda cool that they just threw away every other sequel and just ran this as a direct sequel to the original. Loved the "isnt he your moms brother?", "No thats just something people made up", to get that idea out of the way - and brought it back to Michael just being a crazy w/ no real motive. The ending was "eh", and a lot of the middle stuff was "eh", but I think it was a decent Halloween film. Yeah, but that was what made no sense to me, why throw even Halloween II away? When Laurie said "Michael killed five people" I was like "Say what?". Ok, 5 in the first movie, but 10 more in Halloween II, which was the same night, so 15 would've been the correct number. But over all it was average, even the kills were mostly poor, and then they wanted to make up for that with the head smash of the doctor. Meh. But it wasn't bad, rather average. Nothing special, and I've to say, Jamie Lee looks a lot better with short hair! |
|
|
|
Post by heehawes on Feb 16, 2019 10:22:52 GMT
I thought it was ok. it was kinda cool that they just threw away every other sequel and just ran this as a direct sequel to the original. Loved the "isnt he your moms brother?", "No thats just something people made up", to get that idea out of the way - and brought it back to Michael just being a crazy w/ no real motive. The ending was "eh", and a lot of the middle stuff was "eh", but I think it was a decent Halloween film. Yeah, but that was what made no sense to me, why throw even Halloween II away? When Laurie said "Michael killed five people" I was like "Say what?". Ok, 5 in the first movie, but 10 more in Halloween II, which was the same night, so 15 would've been the correct number. But over all it was average, even the kills were mostly poor, and then they wanted to make up for that with the head smash of the doctor. Meh. But it wasn't bad, rather average. Nothing special, and I've to say, Jamie Lee looks a lot better with short hair! Halloween II is where it was revealed that Michael was her brother, so they threw that movie out completely rather than partially. I dunno. I liked that aspect. I thought it was goofy though, when whats his name, Loomis' student dude put Michaels mask on. I'm like "oh nooo, dont be doing this" and then they quickly went away from that and back on track. 🤷🏻♀️ |
|
|
|
Post by drnick on Feb 16, 2019 10:32:25 GMT
Yeah, but that was what made no sense to me, why throw even Halloween II away? When Laurie said "Michael killed five people" I was like "Say what?". Ok, 5 in the first movie, but 10 more in Halloween II, which was the same night, so 15 would've been the correct number. But over all it was average, even the kills were mostly poor, and then they wanted to make up for that with the head smash of the doctor. Meh. But it wasn't bad, rather average. Nothing special, and I've to say, Jamie Lee looks a lot better with short hair! Halloween II is where it was revealed that Michael was her brother, so they threw that movie out completely rather than partially. I dunno. I liked that aspect. I thought it was goofy though, when whats his name, Loomis' student dude put Michaels mask on. I'm like "oh nooo, dont be doing this" and then they quickly went away from that and back on track. 🤷🏻♀️ I didn't like it, not only do I like Halloween II, I like that it continues directly where the first movie ended, so it's just one night. Separating them makes no sense to me, besides I don't get why Michael being Laurie's brother would be "bad" for the story anyway. But yes, I thought don't fuck this up, too, when the doctor put the mask on, fortunately that ended quickly.  |
|
|
|
Post by heehawes on Feb 16, 2019 10:50:10 GMT
Halloween II is where it was revealed that Michael was her brother, so they threw that movie out completely rather than partially. I dunno. I liked that aspect. I thought it was goofy though, when whats his name, Loomis' student dude put Michaels mask on. I'm like "oh nooo, dont be doing this" and then they quickly went away from that and back on track. 🤷🏻♀️ I didn't like it, not only do I like Halloween II, I like that it continues directly where the first movie ended, so it's just one night. Separating them makes no sense to me, besides I don't get why Michael being Laurie's brother would be "bad" for the story anyway. But yes, I thought don't fuck this up, too, when the doctor put the mask on, fortunately that ended quickly. I think the reason to ignore HALLOWEEN II in this new movie is because having Michael be Lauries brother gives him a motive. They wanted him to be more of a crazy boogieman type again. Like he was in the first. Just a psycho. 🤷🏻♀️ Nothing wrong w/ II, but its just creating a new story line for a character. I thought it was fun. Comic books do it too, write a whole new story for the same characters ignoring other stories w/ them completely. I dont think this movie was necessary at all, But it was decently entertaining. I dont know if I'll ever see it a second time - but it was fun once. :] |
|
|
|
Post by Dani on Feb 16, 2019 20:45:14 GMT
Lousy chick films. I don’t even remember the name of it but some girl misses her train and loses her bag and this guy comes around 😴
|
|
|
|
Post by drnick on Feb 16, 2019 20:55:37 GMT
Lousy chick films. I don’t even remember the name of it but some girl misses her train and loses her bag and this guy comes around 😴 ... I've seen porn movies that started that way.  Just kidding.  |
|
|
|
Post by Dani on Feb 16, 2019 20:58:17 GMT
Lousy chick films. I don’t even remember the name of it but some girl misses her train and loses her bag and this guy comes around 😴 ... I've seen porn movies that started that way. Just kidding. TMI TMI TMI |
|
Just kidding. 